Fechar

1. Identificação
Tipo de ReferênciaArtigo em Revista Científica (Journal Article)
Sitemtc-m16d.sid.inpe.br
Código do Detentorisadg {BR SPINPE} ibi 8JMKD3MGPCW/3DT298S
Identificador8JMKD3MGP7W/36JT3FE
Repositóriosid.inpe.br/mtc-m19@80/2009/12.17.10.59
Última Atualização2013:08.05.13.35.18 (UTC) administrator
Repositório de Metadadossid.inpe.br/mtc-m19@80/2009/12.17.10.59.14
Última Atualização dos Metadados2022:03.08.17.51.42 (UTC) administrator
Chave SecundáriaINPE--PRE/
DOI10.1007/s10584-009-9610-6
ISSN1558-8432
1558-8424
Chave de CitaçãoLahsen:2009:PoCaSi
TítuloA science-policy interface in the global south: the politics of carbon sinks and science in Brazil
Ano2009
Data de Acesso18 maio 2024
Tipo de Trabalhojournal article
Tipo SecundárioPRE PI
Número de Arquivos1
Tamanho397 KiB
2. Contextualização
AutorLahsen, Myanna Hvid
GrupoCST-CST-INPE-MCT-BR
AfiliaçãoInstituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)
Endereço de e-Mail do Autormyanna.lahsen@inpe.br
RevistaJournal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
Volume97  
Número3-4 
Páginas339-372  
Histórico (UTC)2009-12-17 11:04:20 :: marciana -> banon ::
2009-12-17 12:50:10 :: banon -> marciana ::
2010-01-08 16:44:24 :: marciana -> administrator ::
2010-05-11 01:03:00 :: administrator -> banon ::
2010-05-12 13:32:17 :: banon -> administrator ::
2022-03-08 17:51:42 :: administrator -> marciana :: 2009
3. Conteúdo e estrutura
É a matriz ou uma cópia?é a matriz
Estágio do Conteúdoconcluido
Transferível1
Tipo do ConteúdoExternal Contribution
Tipo de Versãopublisher
Palavras-Chaveamazonian rain-forest
tropical deforestation
epistemic communities
climate-change
civil-society
atmosphere
world
co2
environment
greenhouse
ResumoThe IPCC and other global environmental assessment processes stress the need for national scientific participation to ensure decision makers' trust in the associated scientific conclusions and political agendas. The underpinning assumption is that the relationship between scientists and decision makers at the national level is characterized by trust and interpretive synergy. Drawing on ethnographic research in Brazil, this article challenges that assumption through a case study of the policy uptake of divergent scientific interpretations as to whether or not the Amazon is a net carbon sink. It shows that the carbon sink issue became a site for struggles between important Brazilian scientists and decision-makers with central authority over the definition of the country's official position in international climate negotiations. In a geopolitically charged scientific controversy involving scientific evidence bearing on the Kyoto Protocol, Brazilian decision makers studied revealed critical distance from national scientists advancing evidence that the Amazon is a net carbon sink. As such, the decision-makers' interpretations were at odds also with dominant framings in the Brazilian media and closer to those of American scientists involved in carbon cycle research in the Amazon. Seeking to explain this disconnect, the paper discusses the divergent policy preferences of key scientists and decision-makers involved, and the correlations of these preferences with interpretations of the available scientific evidence. It identifies the continued impact of a national political tradition of limited participation in decision making and suggests that this tradition-while increasingly challenged by countervailing democratizing trends-is reinforced by key Brazilian decision makers' constructions of science as a medium through which rich countries maintain political advantage. Reflecting this, key Brazilian decision-makers justified rejecting national scientists' interpretations of the Amazon as a significant overall carbon sink by suggesting that the scientists' scientific training and associated foreign interactions bias them in favor of foreign interests, compromising their ability to accurately identify national interests. The paper situates its analysis in terms of theories of the science-policy interface and argues for greater attention to the role of culturally and politically laden understandings of science and the role of science in policy and geopolitics.
ÁreaMET
Arranjourlib.net > BDMCI > Fonds > Produção anterior à 2021 > COCST > A science-policy interface...
Conteúdo da Pasta docacessar
Conteúdo da Pasta sourcenão têm arquivos
Conteúdo da Pasta agreementnão têm arquivos
4. Condições de acesso e uso
URL dos dadoshttp://urlib.net/ibi/8JMKD3MGP7W/36JT3FE
URL dos dados zipadoshttp://urlib.net/zip/8JMKD3MGP7W/36JT3FE
Idiomaen
Arquivo Alvo10.1007_s10584-009-9610-6.pdf
Grupo de Usuáriosadministrator
banon
marciana
Grupo de Leitoresadministrator
marciana
Visibilidadeshown
Política de Arquivamentodenypublisher6 allowfinaldraft
Permissão de Leituraallow from all
Permissão de Atualizaçãonão transferida
5. Fontes relacionadas
Repositório Espelhosid.inpe.br/mtc-m19@80/2009/08.21.17.02.53
Unidades Imediatamente Superiores8JMKD3MGPCW/3F3T29H
DivulgaçãoWEBSCI; PORTALCAPES.
Acervo Hospedeirosid.inpe.br/mtc-m19@80/2009/08.21.17.02
6. Notas
Campos Vaziosalternatejournal archivist callnumber copyholder copyright creatorhistory descriptionlevel e-mailaddress format isbn label lineage mark month nextedition notes orcid parameterlist parentrepositories previousedition previouslowerunit progress project resumeid rightsholder schedulinginformation secondarydate secondarymark session shorttitle sponsor subject tertiarymark tertiarytype url
7. Controle da descrição
e-Mail (login)marciana
atualizar 


Fechar